In the Age of Internet Censorship, we document all of the Lies, Crimes, and Disinformation told by Donald Trump and his Administration before Big Tech scrubs it all from their platforms.

118 views | yesterday

State of the Union: Donald Trump lies about Replacing the Income Tax with Tariffs yet again while throwing a Tantrum about the Supreme Court Ruling on his Illegal Tariffs that were filed under the wrong act, the IEEPA Act of 1977, instead of the Fair Tra

Yeah, he says the key word, "eventually." This word means there is no time frame. It just means one day, which adds up to nothing. He's giving you Tariffs plus the Income Tax together. The Tariffs only generated about $200 - 250 Billion in Fiscal Year 2025. You can't fund a $7 Trillion Budget with just the Tariffs alone. He doesn't plan to make any spending cuts and just wants to raise taxes via tariffs. It's also quite pitiful how it looked like the Supreme Court Justices just looked at him like he was a baby throwing a temper tantrum, especially the look Amy Coney-Barrett was giving him. It looked like a mother feeling sorry her son as he had a melt down in front of her and is like, "oh, you poor thing, you." The guy he should be blaming is Howard Lutnick, NOT the Supreme Court. Lutnick wrote the Orders and filed them under the wrong act, the IEEPA Act of 1977, which no President has ever used to impose Tariffs in history, and also not complying with the Fair Trade Act of 1974. Under the IEEPA Act, you could impose Embargos and stopping imports, but no one has ever tried to use it for Tariffs. Lutnick did it to get those Tariff Rebates syphoned off to Cantor Fitzgerald, where they ran a Tariff Rebate Scam, so some of these tariffs were purposefully done incorrectly and it seems that was the goal, so they can enrich themselves in the process of fleecing Americans of more of their disposable income to which they will have none and only have bare necessities left, if even that. Had it been done correctly under the Fair Trade Act of 1974, they would have put time limits on these Tariffs up to 150 days and they needed a reason for them either to correct a trade imbalance or to protect an industry or multiple industries and the Supreme Court believed they fell short in doing so.